Get the header on this post: Lawyer Ends Up Dead After Taking On Rove
Of course, you read the article and it turns out that the lawyer was pushing nonsense related to the whole Plame affair:Sanford: Yes, thank you. There has been a lot of speculation concerning the meaning of the underlying statute and the grand jury investigation concerning Mr. Rove. The question is, have the legal counsel to the White House or White House staff reviewed the statute in sufficient specificity to determine whether a violation of that statute would, in effect, constitute treason?
And if you've been following Plamegate, you know it's been over forever; in fact the lawyer asked the question in July of 2005. Dang, that Rove sure waits awhile before getting his revenge!