More Able DangerHere's a report from
Fox that indicates why the Commission supposedly ignored the Able Danger intelligence:
Felzenberg said the information about Atta was considered suspect because it didn't jibe with many other findings. For example, the intelligence officer said Atta was in the United States in late 1999, but travel records confirmed that he did not enter the country until late 2000.Let me get this straight; a CIA group highlighted Atta's connection with Al Qaeda in 2000, but the 9-11 Commission discounted their information because there were conflicts with travel records? And let me say the obvious here: That travel records show Atta came here in 2000 does not mean that he couldn't have been here earlier.
Also see
Jim Geraghty's comments on what is known and not known.
Countdown to liberals claiming that the Able Danger story is just a distraction from Cindy Sheehan (or Karl Rove): 10,9,8.....