Michelle Malkin Covers ArtShe notes some of the more
ridiculous art in the news, including a photograph of the painting that depicts President Bush getting sodomized by an oil sheikh (which of course, won an award).
Interestingly, the piece won an award from a "local gay arts activist", whose only complaint was that Bush should have been on top. I'll confess to being a little confused about the whole point of the homoeroticism of the president. The left (and presumably local gay arts activists) think there is nothing wrong with homosexual behavior, right? Then why do they snicker when they see depictions of right wingers engaging in it? Is it all just about "the hypocrisy"?