Lampley Engaging in Dishonest Linking?He starts off with a smear of Diebold, the company that is
rapidly replacing Halliburton in the feverish fantasy world of the left.
Make no mistake: my argument is that the final official vote tally is anything but accurate, that it is the product of massive vote fraud carried out through the programing of Diebold voting machines and various other machinations aimed at suppressing, destroying or losing Kerry votes.But then he goes off the deep end with this boner:
Various statisticians have reported that the odds on the occurrence of variances from exit polls to actual results such as were produced in this election range up to 959 000 to 1. Sounds like DNA. As US Count Votes notes in a statistical abstract, "No matter how one calculates it, the discrepancy cannot be attributed to chance.Believe it or not, he links "various statisticians" to this post at
Democratic Underground. I mean, is that hilarous or what? Jim, when you link the words "various statisticians" to something, we assume it's going to be reasonably scholarly in nature, not a bleat from one of your fellow sheep who wouldn't know a standard deviation from a standard deviant. Linking to that post with the words "various statisticians" is intellectually dishonest. Note as well that the linked post does not contain the odds 959,000 to 1 anywhere.
I sincerely hope that Byron York doesn't waste his time responding to this nonsense.
